Supreme Court nominee, Justice Senyo Dzamefe, has firmly opposed any attempt to suppress investigative journalism, even in instances where such reporting may impact the public image of the judiciary.
Appearing before Parliament’s Appointments Committee on Monday, June 16, 2025, Justice Dzamefe made it clear that he does not support the repression of journalists who conduct their duties truthfully and responsibly.
“But generally, I wouldn’t recommend repression,” he stated during his vetting. “Out of what is true, I would recommend suppression? No, I wouldn’t.”
Responding to questions about balancing judicial reputation with media freedom and public accountability, the nominee underscored the judiciary’s inability to silence the press, provided journalists act within ethical and factual boundaries.
READ: Appointments Committee begins vetting of Supreme Court nominees today
“We can’t gag the press so far as they do a good job and they don’t misinform us. We don’t have any authority to gag them. The only guideline is that make sure what you report on is the truth. The press can come to report on cases or come to do anything with the judiciary. We don’t have the power to stop them,” he explained. “Just make sure that what you are reporting on is the truth and it’s fair.”
Justice Dzamefe encouraged journalists to seek clarity and conduct thorough follow-ups before publication, cautioning against reporting based on perception.
READ: NSS Scandal: Mustapha Ussif Breaks Silence, Denies GH₵548m Fraud Claims
“If you don’t understand, ask, don’t report on perceptions,” he added.
His comments reaffirm the crucial role of press freedom in promoting transparency and accountability, even within the highest levels of the judiciary.
Source: Ghana/Starrfm.com.gh/Hamdia Mohammed
