The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has cautioned Ghana against keeping losses incurred under the Domestic Gold Purchase Programme on the balance sheet of the Bank of Ghana (BoG), warning that the practice could undermine the central bank’s ability to effectively deliver on its core mandate of price stability.
In its Staff Report following the conclusion of the Fifth Review under Ghana’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement, the Fund disclosed that losses from the artisanal and small-scale (ASM) doré gold transactions component of the Gold for Reserves (G4R) programme had reached US$214 million by the end of the third quarter of 2025, equivalent to about 0.2 percent of GDP.
According to the IMF, the losses stem largely from trading activities, as well as fees paid to GoldBod off-takers and exchange-rate-related costs.
The disclosure triggered renewed debate among analysts and political actors, with some calling for a reassessment of the programme. Appearing before Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee on January 12, 2026, Governor of the Bank of Ghana, Dr. Johnson Pandit Asiama, called for a unified national approach to strengthen the programme rather than abandon it.
“The focus should be on reforms that strengthen the programme’s efficiency so it can serve its intended purpose of stabilizing the currency and supporting national development,” he told the Committee.
Clarifying the IMF’s position to EIB Network’s Emmanuel Agyabeng at a press briefing on Thursday, January 15, 2026, IMF Communications Director, Julie Kozack, said the Fund recognizes the important benefits delivered by the domestic gold purchase programme, particularly during a period of intense economic stress.
“On the benefit side, what we see is a contribution to a buildup of international reserves and reduced pressure on the foreign exchange market during a difficult period for Ghana,” she said.
However, Ms. Kozack noted that the IMF also identified significant costs associated with the programme, describing them as quasi-fiscal losses, losses that do not formally appear on the government’s fiscal balance sheet but ultimately carry fiscal implications.
To address these risks, the IMF has recommended stronger transparency, improved governance, and enhanced risk management, especially within the GOLDBOD framework linked to the central bank.
Crucially, the Fund has advised that the losses be removed from the Bank of Ghana’s balance sheet and transferred to the national budget.
“We also strongly recommend that the losses should be brought on balance sheet rather than held on the balance sheet of the Central Bank,” Ms. Kozack stated.
She stressed that the recommendation goes beyond accounting treatment and is a critical policy decision with far-reaching implications for macroeconomic stability and institutional credibility.
By transferring the losses to the budget, the IMF believes the quasi-fiscal nature of the programme would become more transparent, enabling clearer fiscal oversight and accountability while safeguarding the financial integrity and operational independence of the central bank.
“Why is this important? It’s important to ensure that the Bank of Ghana remains well-positioned to deliver on its key price stability mandate,” she explained.
